Skip to content
Tuesday, October 13, 2026
VIPWorks

Could Other Countries Follow Australia's Example in Restricting Social Media for Teenagers Under 16?

Australia's decisive move to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are observing closely to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising group of countries are exploring parallel bans.

  • Denmark has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our kids' childhood". A law may be passed next year.
  • Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "power of the recommendation systems".
  • The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an similar ban is "an measures on the table".
  • In The Spanish government, the president has called on the legislature to pass a law raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
  • In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
  • The government in The Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding motion demanding a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it warns of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the step does not enact binding law.

"A clear age limit is a solid first step," commented the parliamentarian supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "supported by conclusive research".

Earlier, support grew behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. However, the administration vowed to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. One foundation founded by the family of a girl who was lost after encountering disturbing social media material contends that a strict age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to design tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," commented a leading peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, regulation is mostly unfolding at the regional level amid country-wide stalemate.

  • The state of Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
  • Florida has enacted a law barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
  • Virginia has passed a law limiting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with additional use dependent on parental permission.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from various figures to copy the Australian example, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Outside of these regions, further states are likewise considering moves.

  • Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
  • Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies strike a more measured tone. A major UN agency has warned that social media bans carry risks and "may even backfire". The body points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

As this global debate continues, the steps of this nation and several other countries show that governments globally are increasingly willing to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.

MR
The writer

Michelle Reeves

A seasoned IT consultant with over 15 years of experience in digital innovation and enterprise solutions.

VIPWorks

Type to search articles.